![]() I'm not actually saying ACR/LR is the best, just that for many it is more than sufficient, and a far cry from "blows." How about laziness, a willingness to forgo better results elsewhere for convenience and speed If the noise reduction in ACR/Lr does blow, why have so many photographers said that since Adobe improved it, they no longer turn to plug-ins Wouldn't that be the default that you are comparing the other options against Noise reduction in ACR/Lightroom blows in comparison. yeah, ACR/LR noise reduction really does blow. The real question, and the real value in seeing ACR/LR next to the original set of comparisons, is to see if any of the plug-ins are $80 better than ACR/LR, for the style of photos being shot. If they were not such plugins and apps would have died off years ago. Lightroom does a lovely job with RX100m3 RAW files. That means high ISO rates and image noise. I particularly like the way fine grain falls off into shadow areas. Telephoto lenses and wildlife action mean high shutter speeds. I have only compared it with PhotoNinja and DXO Optics Pro. ![]() It depends on when its relative performance changed. Neat Image for Photoshop is a digital filter plug-in designed to reduce visible noise and grain in digital photographic images. A few years ago, Aperture did better than LR, at least with Sony A700 RAW. ![]() You will learn how to build a noise profile for an image. ![]() Maybe the plugins were better "years ago", but that my not be the case now.Neat Image Crack is designed to reduce noise in your digital images. The Basic Workflow tutorial walks you through the key stages of applying Neat Image to an image in Photoshop. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |